Two lanes, two engines
A partial case and an edentulous arch are different clinical problems, so they do not share a safety engine. Each is planned against the constraints that actually govern it.
Partial — tooth-supported
Indication
One or more missing teeth, with neighbouring teeth still in place.
How it is planned
The guide seats on the remaining dentition. Placement is chosen by searching direction, entry point and implant size against weighted clinical rules, renormalised per site.
- arrow_rightGuide rests on adjacent teeth for stability
- arrow_rightDrill sleeves fused into a printable splint
- arrow_rightPer-site scoring across the full rule set
- arrow_rightAlternatives shown beside the production plan
Full-arch — edentulous
Indication
A fully edentulous arch, or one where the remaining teeth come out during surgery.
How it is planned
A pin-fixated base is anchored to bone, and reduction, implant and carrier layers seat onto it. Gates are hard pass/warn/fail rather than weighted.
- arrow_rightStackable base for an already-edentulous arch
- arrow_rightSequential two-part protocol for terminal dentition
- arrow_rightBone reduction planned and verified against a cut plane
- arrow_rightCommon-mode seating error checked across all sites
What you get back
See it run on a real case
We can walk through a planned case end to end — the scan, the constraints that shaped the placement, and the guide that came out.
Get in touch